Відео

All science began with with philosophy.

I learn his name from Albert Hirschman, economist.

proto-god is dead

Read the secret of light walter russell and secret destiny of america manly hall. J krishnamurti awakening of intelligence

Join our course on the Dynamics of Power: halkyonacademy.teachable.com/p/philosophy-of-power Seminars begin Sunday, 9th of June at 6pm UK time /1pm EST.

Join our course on the Dynamics of Power: halkyonacademy.teachable.com/p/philosophy-of-power Seminars begin Sunday, 9th of June at 6pm UK time /1pm EST.

Join our course on the Dynamics of Power: halkyonacademy.teachable.com/p/philosophy-of-power Seminars begin Sunday, 9th of June at 6pm UK time /1pm EST.

More like empiricism as a means to indubitable certainty - is impossible. But also that metaphysics to the same end is impossible but he wasn’t right about this as the scott of Koenigsberg would so spectacularly prove.

The West Has Fallen.

Foucault (amongst others) isn't able to offer a satisfactory answer to the question of the difference between power and authority

I just ordered hardcover of Form and Actuality! Cannot wait….I think a modern, watered down version of Spengler would be a historian known as Carroll Quigley. His “Evolution of Civilizations” sounds close to a modernized “Decline of the West”, however, have yet to read Spengler so may be incorrect.

xx

He's too French for me.

Johannes good day, thank you for presenting the point of view of of Boudrillard, unknown to me. Je suppose que la langue française vous est accesible, cela est plutot rare! Be able to access the original writings is most insightful to get the essence of the thoughts described in this work.I will inform around this subject and ctr.

Thank you 🙏🏻!

M. Heidegger und M. Castells gehen dann irgendwo doch Hand in Hand...

I’m starting my Greek philosophy … What order should I read?

Are you an orthodox Christian?

This comment on how airplanes were developed at 17:30 is interesting: "the attempt to mimic birds and how they fly didn't achieve anything..." I wouldn't be at all surprised if eventually similar observations on artificial intelligence are made, e.g. "the attempt to mimic humans and how they think didn't achieve anything..."

I think this critique of Hancock is correct. It really shows in his conversation with Rupert Sheldrake in which he kept losing his nerve about governments and religions; though, yes, he does mean well. He has a blind spot and seems to be driven in great part by a frustrated resentment.

Isn't shared/collective experience a pretty convincing argument in itself? That's what I understand empricism to be. Am I missing something?

Pelo que entendi, Kant limitou ou reduziu o alcance da razao ao conhecimento cientico e, consequentemente, a dominacao da natureza. Ou seja, como Descartes que proclamara a necessitade de termos uma "ciencia que nos tornasse senhores e donos da natureza".

Surprised both of you didn't know about Peter Turchin. If you do read him, I'd like to hear your thoughts.

Looking forward to watching your channel grow! It’s some of the best content on UA-cam

I felt moved by Beata’s ‘prayer’ or ‘meditation’ on the Where-of-Dasein. In Beata’s words the Where became a poietic holding of being, a dwelling suspended by the tension between the limits and openness of the place-where being can emerge. Thanks for sharing.

another amazingly conceived syllabus of great thinkers ... wonderful to see Sean back again, whose background as a scientist brings an intriguing perspective. i've already learned much just looking up de Jouvenel, Luhmann, and Ellul. thank you and best

What are the titles of those series of books I see back there 👀 blue, light green and red ones

The concept is quite similar. In Vedanta school of philosophy, the light is already there, but it is unseen by one until one tries to recognize it through 3 paths(knowledge, devotion, meditation) practices it daily for "clearing" the cloud of ignorance/darkness -- the state is called Satchitanananda in sanskrit, which is not equivalent to Enlightenment

I suppose I appreciate and should be welcoming towards thoughtful people reflecting on missteps and wanting to point forward in a good direction, but the cost is too great to be waived away in a therapy session.

Decline of the west is a victory for our culture, and a defeat for crooked capitalists... Once 'The Western Cultures' are gone... the World can go back to bathing once a month, and eating from garbage heaps... The crooked capitalists did this to America... REPUBLICAN > President Nixon, 'Opened China' to the west. Big Corporations in America saw in China, 20 billion people that needed to be driving Buicks... Then came REPUBLICAN > President Reagan, and his "FREE TRADE" agreements... EXPORTING GOOD PAYING JOBS >> basically American Corporations became "Multination Corporations" exported good middle class jobs to slave labor countries like China India and the rest of Asia. Basically Americans needed to work for .05 cents an hour or LOSE THEIR JOBS... This is what KILLED THE WEST... GREED and CHEAP CHINESE WAGES... In the end, birth rates in the US fell off replacement numbers, the "CULTURE" dies off and disappears... the "Replacement" population from the turd World have none of the skills or intuitive brain power to 'maintain' the 'culture'. Back to the Dark Ages. "History doesnt repeat itself, but sometimes it rhymes..". Mark Twain. The US is falling, just as the Great Roman Empire did.

Basic empiricism says that past events give us a method to predict future events. The sun rises every morning so it will forever, but Hume pointed to the weakness of this belief. Science is built on empiricism, and it is how the human mind plans for the future.

I'm writing his/her all day. I blame the woke

This was an excellent presentation and I enjoyed it immensely. I feel that something vital has been reconnected in it. Definitely worth a review or three! Thank you again 🙏 PS: It would be a little nicer if Cambridge would upgrade their audio situation a bit but it was very nice for them to host.

Is there a citable script of the lecture? (the automatic transcript by YT is garbage)

What a great lecture on Plato!

This is what I’m gonna be

Please elaborate.

I made it through 4 pages of the introducion to the DotW Vol 1 before giving up, as I had absolutely no idea what Spengler was talking about. Am I simply............ retarded? 🤔

"almost always ignored by academics" Actually, wasn't this one of the main criticism aimed at Kant by Adorno & Horkheimer in their _Dialektik der Aufklärung_ ? p. 6: "Myth becomes enlightenment and nature mere objectivity. Human beings purchase the increase in their power with estrangement from that over which it is exerted. Enlightenment stands in the same relationship to things as the dictator to human beings. He knows them to the extent that he can manipulate them. The man of science knows things to the extent that he can make them. Their “in-itself ” becomes “for him.” In their transformation the essence of things is revealed as always the same, a substrate of domination. This identity constitutes the unity of nature."

Remember this isn't true for all empiricisms!

Sir, may I know how old you are?